LEGITIMATE LEADERSHIP’S NEWSLETTER
For more information on any of these events, please email [email protected]
ARTICLE: THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LEGITIMATE LEADERS TO ESTABLISH TRUST
By Lulu de Beer, associate, Legitimate Leadership.
By Lulu de Beer, associate, Legitimate Leadership.
Employees look to their leaders to be trustworthy and trusting. The employee’s perception of the leader’s intention towards them is influenced by whether the leader is perceived to be approachable, empathetic and trustworthy. The employee will trust his leader if the leader displays trust of the employee and a firm commitment to care for and grow the employee.
The leader builds trust through making an effort to connect with every employee in her team. This requires that the leader shows up as human, not perfect. The leader shows an interest in employees beyond their presence at work and their ability to produce work output.
Tshepo took over a team that had been through various management changes and was no longer delivering to the needs of the business. Within two weeks of arriving he presented his extensive criticism of the team and announced a restructure. Despite its dysfunction up to this point, the team resisted and within days he was removed.
What had been required was a leader who would first establish connections with the team members, get to know them and understand how they had been impacted by previous leaders. While the team results may not have been satisfactory, the employees were individually competent and willing. Asking for their views and ideas would have led to them self-correcting and living up to their potential.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE BY CLICKING HERE
ARTICLE: WANT TO KNOW HOW YOU ARE DOING AS A LEADER? JUST ASK YOUR PEOPLE!
By Joshua Hayman, associate, Leadership.
Legitimate Leadership believes that if one truly wants to know how a leader is doing, the best judges are the very people who depend on that person for leadership. We incorporate this principle into our approach to transforming leaders by conducting Leadership Surveys for each participant. These surveys diagnose how the leader is perceived to be aligned to the four key criteria of giving Care, providing Means, cultivating Ability, and holding people Accountable.
The process is of course confidential. It provides leaders with immensely useful feedback – and gives them clarity and focus on where their development opportunities lie.
When discussing this feedback with leaders on our programmes, one of the questions I often ask is how often they themselves ask their people directly for feedback on how they are doing. The response is not about how often it happens, but more about whether it happens at all.
It always strikes me as such a missed opportunity for leaders to build trust with their people. I insist that they start doing it, and doing it regularly.
Why? The crux of the Legitimate Leadership framework is whether subordinates perceive their manager to be genuinely concerned about their wellbeing. It is my view that there are few things that demonstrate this more practically on a day-to-day basis than a leader being genuinely interested in the impact that her words and deeds have on her people.
When I first suggest to leaders that they start doing this, the number one concern is that the leader will not get the truth. That the answer will be that “everything is fine”. There is therefore no point in asking unless one uses a confidential process.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE BY CLICKING HERE
VIDEO: FIVE WAYS TO LEAD IN AN ERA OF CONSTANT CHANGE
By Jim Hemerling, an American transformation consultant.
COMMENT ON THIS VIDEO BY WENDY LAMBOURNE, DIRECTOR, LEGITIMATE LEADERSHIP:
In Legitimate Leadership workshops we pose the question to leaders “why change?” The answer simply is that as leaders that is what we are paid to do. And leading change is 90% about people and only 10% about systems and structural change. Jim Hemerling offers five “strategic imperatives” for leading change which are wholly consistent with the Legitimate Leadership principles and practices.
SUMMARY OF THIS VIDEO:
Have you ever noticed when you ask someone to talk about a change they’re making for the better in their personal lives, they’re often really energetic? For most people, self-transformation projects occupy a very positive emotional space. They are empowering, energizing, even exhilarating. For instance, look at some of the titles of self-help books: “Awaken the Giant Within”, “Practicing the Power of Now”,” or “You are a Badass: How to Stop Doubting Your Greatness and Start Living an Awesome Life.”
But the transformation of organizations occupies a very different emotional space. If you’re like most people, when you hear the words “Our organization is going to start a transformation”, you think, “Uh-oh … layoffs.” The blood drains from your face, your mind goes into overdrive, frantically searching for some place to run and hide.
Well, you can run, but not hide. Most of us spend the majority of our waking hours involved in organizations. And due to changes in globalization, advances in technology and other factors, the reality is our organizations are constantly having to adapt. In fact, I call this the era of “always-on” transformation.
When I shared this idea with my wife Nicola, she said, “Always-on transformation? That sounds exhausting.” And that may be exactly what you’re thinking – and you would be right. Particularly if we continue to approach the transformation of organizations the way we always have.
But because we can’t hide, we need to sort out two things.
First, why is transformation so exhausting? Second, how do we fix it?
First of all, let’s acknowledge that change is hard. People naturally resist change, especially when it’s imposed on them. But there are things that organizations do that make change even harder and more exhausting for people than needed. First of all, leaders often wait too long to act. As a result,everything is happening in crisis mode. Which, of course, tends to be exhausting. Or, given the urgency, they just focus on the short-term results, but that doesn’t give any hope for the future. Or they just take a superficial, one-off approach, hoping that they can return to business as usual as soon as the crisis is over.
This kind of approach is the way some approach preparing for standardized tests. In order to get test scores to go up, teachers will end up teaching to the test. That approach can work; test results often do go up. But it fails the fundamental goal of education: to prepare students to succeed over the long term.
So given these obstacles, what can we do to transform the way we transform organizations so rather than being exhausting, it’s empowering and energizing? To do that, we need to focus on five strategic imperatives, all of which have one thing in common: putting people first.
The FIRST imperative for putting people first is to inspire through purpose. Most transformations have financial and operational goals. These are important and they can be energizing to leaders, but they tend not to be very motivating to most people in the organization. To motivate
I live in the San Francisco Bay area. And right now, our basketball team is the best in the league. We won the 2015 championship, and we’re favored to win again this year. There are many explanations for this. They have some fabulous players, but one of the key reasons is their head coach, Steve Kerr, is an inclusive leader. When Kerr came to the Warriors in 2014, the Warriors were looking for a major transformation. They hadn’t won a national championship since 1975.
Kerr had a clear vision, and he immediately got to work. From the outset, he reached out and engaged the players and the staff. He created an environment of open debate and solicited suggestions. During games he would often ask, “What are you seeing that I’m missing?” more broadly, the transformation needs to connect with a deeper sense of purpose.
The Lego Group has become an extraordinary global company. Under its very capable leadership, it has undergone a series of transformations. While each of these has had a very specific focus, the North Star, linking and guiding all of them, has been Lego’s powerful purpose: inspire and develop the builders of tomorrow. Expanding globally? It’s not about increasing sales, but about giving millions of additional children access to Lego building bricks. Investment and innovation? It’s not about developing new products, but about enabling more children to experience the joy of learning through play. Not surprisingly, that deep sense of purpose tends to be highly motivating to Lego’s people.
The SECOND imperative for putting people first is to go all in. Too many transformations are nothing more than head-count cutting exercises; layoffs under the guise of transformation. In the face of relentless competition, you may well have to take the painful decision to downsize the organization, just as you may have to lose some weight in order to run a marathon. But losing weight alone will not get you across the finish line with a winning time. To win you need to go all in. Rather than just cutting costs, you need to think about initiatives that will enable you to win in the medium term, initiatives to drive growth, actions that will fundamentally change the way the company operates, and very importantly, investments to develop the leadership and the talent.
The THIRD imperative for putting people first is to enable people with the capabilities that they need to succeed during the transformation and beyond.
Over the years I’ve competed in a number of triathlons. Frankly, I’m not that good, but I do have one distinct capability – I am remarkably fast at finding my bike. By the time I finish the swim, almost all the bikes are already gone.
Real triathletes know that each leg – the swim, the bike, the run – really requires different capabilities, different tools, different skills, different techniques. Likewise when we transform organizations, we need to be sure that we’re giving our people the skills and the tools they need along the way.
Chronos, a global software company, recognized the need to transfer from building software products to building software as a service. To enable its people to make that transformation, first they invested in new tools that would enable their employees to monitor the usage of the features as well as customer satisfaction with the new service. They also invested in skills development, so that their employees would be able to resolve customer service problems on the spot. And very importantly, they also reinforced the collaborative behaviors that would be required to deliver an end-to-end seamless customer experience. Because of these investments, rather than feeling overwhelmed by the transformation, Chronos employees actually felt energized and empowered in their new roles.
In the era of “always-on” transformation, change is a constant. My FOURTH imperative therefore is to instil a culture of continuous learning. When Satya Nadella became the CEO of Microsoft in February 2014, he embarked on an ambitious transformation journey to prepare the company to compete in a mobile-first, cloud-first world. This included changes to strategy, the organization and very importantly, the culture. Microsoft’s culture at the time was one of silos and internal competition – not exactly conducive to learning. Nadella took this head-on. He rallied his leadership around his vision for a living, learning culture, shifting from a fixed mindset where your role was to show up as the smartest person in the room, to a growth mindset, where your role was to listen, to learn and to bring out the best in people. Well, early days, but Microsoft employees have already noticed this shift in the culture – clear evidence of Microsoft putting people first.
My FIFTH and final imperative is specifically for leaders. In a transformation, a leader needs to have a vision, a clear road map with milestones, and then you need to hold people accountable for results. In other words, you need to be directive. But in order to capture the hearts and minds of people, you also need to be inclusive. Inclusive leadership is critical to putting people
One of the best examples of this came in game four of the 2015 finals. The Warriors were down two games to one when Kerr made the decision to change the starting lineup – a bold move by any measure. The Warriors won the game and went on to win the championship. And it is widely viewed that that move was pivotal in their victory.
Interestingly, it wasn’t actually Kerr’s idea. It was the idea of his 28-year-old assistant, Nick U’Ren. Because of Kerr’s leadership style, U’Ren felt comfortable bringing the idea forward. And Kerr not only listened, but he implemented the idea and then afterwards, gave U’Ren all the credit – actions all consistent with Kerr’s highly inclusive approach to leadership.
In the era of “always-on” transformation, organizations are always going to be transforming. But doing so does not have to be exhausting. We owe it to ourselves, to our organizations and to society more broadly to boldly transform our approach to transformation. To do that, we need to start putting people first.
TO VIEW THE VIDEO CLICK HERE